Triple
T23347145
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | buckminsterfullerene |
E591897
|
entity |
| Predicate | canFormAnion |
P118640
|
FINISHED |
| Object | C60− |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: C60− | Statement: [buckminsterfullerene, canFormAnion, C60−]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canFormAnion Context triple: [buckminsterfullerene, canFormAnion, C60−]
-
A.
hasAnion
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is associated with another entity functioning as its anion (negatively charged ion).
-
B.
hasCation
Indicates that something contains, is associated with, or involves a positively charged ion (cation) in its composition or structure.
-
C.
hasFormalOxidationStateOfMetal
Indicates that a metal entity is assigned a specific formal oxidation state in a chemical context.
-
D.
hasOtherPossibleOxidationState
Indicates that an entity, typically a chemical species, can exist in at least one additional oxidation state beyond the one currently specified.
-
E.
isTypicallyNeutralizedWith
Indicates that something is commonly counteracted, rendered harmless, or balanced by another specified thing.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d20e3d08190bcede87673cafb25 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f19837874481908f1a530261a34819 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 5:33 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69effcfd8d288190937a887fe6023c11 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 12:19 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:19 p.m.