Triple

T23122916
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Seejiq E576948 entity
Predicate subfamily P4180 FINISHED
Object Atayalic languages NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Atayalic languages | Statement: [Seejiq, subfamily, Atayalic languages]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Atayalic languages
Context triple: [Seejiq, subfamily, Atayalic languages]
  • A. Atayalic languages chosen
    The Atayalic languages are a small subgroup of indigenous Austronesian languages spoken in northern Taiwan, primarily by the Atayal and Seediq peoples.
  • B. Kayanic languages
    Kayanic languages are a group of closely related Austronesian languages spoken primarily by Kayan and related indigenous communities in Borneo.
  • C. Pearic languages
    Pearic languages are a small, endangered branch of the Austroasiatic language family spoken by indigenous Pearic communities in Cambodia and nearby regions.
  • D. Thura-Yura languages
    Thura-Yura languages are a group of closely related Australian Aboriginal languages traditionally spoken in parts of South Australia.
  • E. Torres–Banks languages
    The Torres–Banks languages are a group of closely related Oceanic languages spoken in the Torres and Banks Islands of northern Vanuatu.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245f6c2e881909a228fdcfeb7c7d3 completed April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f18e517a0481909829a73fdf255d1c completed April 29, 2026, 4:51 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:59 p.m.