Triple

T22824473
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sultan Malik Shah I E565314 entity
Predicate issue P2239 FINISHED
Object Ahmad Sanjar NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ahmad Sanjar | Statement: [Sultan Malik Shah I, issue, Ahmad Sanjar]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ahmad Sanjar
Context triple: [Sultan Malik Shah I, issue, Ahmad Sanjar]
  • A. Sultan Ahmad Sanjar chosen
    Sultan Ahmad Sanjar was a prominent 12th-century Seljuk sultan who ruled Khorasan and later much of the Seljuk Empire, known for his military campaigns, political struggles, and eventual defeat by the Khwarazmians and Oghuz Turks.
  • B. Baha al-Dawla
    Baha al-Dawla was a prominent 10th–11th century Buyid ruler who governed parts of Iran and Iraq during the later phase of the dynasty’s power.
  • C. Alāʾ al-Dīn
    Alāʾ al-Dīn was the honorific regnal name of Kayqubad II, a 13th-century Seljuk sultan of Rum.
  • D. Shams al-Dawla
    Shams al-Dawla was a Buyid dynasty ruler who governed parts of western Iran in the late 10th and early 11th centuries.
  • E. Nur al-Din Muhammad
    Nur al-Din Muhammad was a medieval Muslim ruler from the Artuqid dynasty who governed the important Anatolian city of Diyarbakır.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2458426188190b58b8ab4844fe420 completed April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f17dd34a248190881f2bccdd9aedce completed April 29, 2026, 3:41 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:34 p.m.