Triple
T22824471
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sultan Malik Shah I |
E565314
|
entity |
| Predicate | issue |
P2239
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Barkiyaruq |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Barkiyaruq | Statement: [Sultan Malik Shah I, issue, Barkiyaruq]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Barkiyaruq Context triple: [Sultan Malik Shah I, issue, Barkiyaruq]
-
A.
Barkiyaruq
chosen
Barkiyaruq was a Seljuk sultan of the late 11th and early 12th centuries who ruled during a period of intense dynastic civil war within the Seljuk Empire.
-
B.
Kurnub
Kurnub is an alternative name for Mamshit, an ancient Nabatean caravan town and archaeological site in the Negev Desert of Israel.
-
C.
Sebkay
Sebkay was an obscure and possibly short-reigning pharaoh of Egypt’s 13th Dynasty during the Second Intermediate Period.
-
D.
Kül Tigin
Kül Tigin was a prominent 8th-century Göktürk prince and military commander celebrated for his role in restoring and strengthening the Second Turkic Khaganate, commemorated in the famous Orkhon inscriptions.
-
E.
Babadag
Babadag is a small town in southeastern Romania known for its historical Ottoman influences and proximity to the Danube Delta.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2458426188190b58b8ab4844fe420 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f17dd34a248190881f2bccdd9aedce |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:41 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:34 p.m.