Triple
T22693458
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | TAF15 |
E561107
|
entity |
| Predicate | canAggregate |
P141271
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [TAF15, canAggregate, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canAggregate Context triple: [TAF15, canAggregate, yes]
-
A.
supportsAggregation
chosen
Indicates that one entity enables or allows another entity to be combined, grouped, or summarized with others through an aggregation operation.
-
B.
canMerge
Indicates that two or more entities are compatible in such a way that they can be combined into a single unified entity or structure.
-
C.
canCollect
Indicates that one entity has the ability or permission to gather, receive, or take possession of another entity.
-
D.
canIncidentallyCollect
Indicates that one entity is able to gather or obtain another entity or its data as an unintended or secondary consequence of some primary action or process.
-
E.
canBeAddedTo
Indicates that one entity is capable of being combined or incorporated with another entity, typically without conflict or incompatibility.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2454d71b48190a1f80af9f82b6fcf |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:35 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1789c6ae481908975b7d27e7624ac |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:18 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ee62b2259c819091ed1387a748b9f3 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 7:08 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:13 p.m.