Triple
T22692633
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sm proteins |
E561090
|
entity |
| Predicate | isEvolutionarilyConserved |
P149308
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Sm proteins, isEvolutionarilyConserved, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isEvolutionarilyConserved Context triple: [Sm proteins, isEvolutionarilyConserved, true]
-
A.
evolutionaryPosition
Indicates the relative placement of an entity within an evolutionary sequence or lineage, such as its stage, branching point, or order of emergence in evolutionary history.
-
B.
notConservedIn
Indicates that a property, feature, or element present in one context, entity, or system is absent or not maintained in another, implying a lack of conservation across them.
-
C.
hasConservationFunction
Indicates that an entity serves a role or performs activities aimed at preserving, protecting, or maintaining the condition of another entity or resource.
-
D.
evolutionControlledBy
Indicates that the process or course of evolution of an entity is directed, regulated, or determined by another entity.
-
E.
evolvedWith
Indicates that two or more entities have undergone evolutionary change in mutual influence or parallel over time.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2454d71b48190a1f80af9f82b6fcf |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:35 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1789ba0148190891781d05ec64f3c |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:18 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ee62b2259c819091ed1387a748b9f3 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 7:08 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ee8843d3308190b6e22bb98ae5c3d8 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:13 p.m.