Triple
T22188417
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Federal Military Government of Nigeria |
E548353
|
entity |
| Predicate | judiciaryStatus |
P79200
|
FINISHED |
| Object | courts continued under military decrees |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: courts continued under military decrees | Statement: [Federal Military Government of Nigeria, judiciaryStatus, courts continued under military decrees]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: judiciaryStatus Context triple: [Federal Military Government of Nigeria, judiciaryStatus, courts continued under military decrees]
-
A.
judicialStatus
chosen
Indicates the legal or court-related condition or standing of an entity within a judicial process (e.g., pending, decided, appealed).
-
B.
courtStatus
Indicates the current legal or procedural state of a case or matter within a court system.
-
C.
judicialReviewStatus
Indicates whether and how a decision, action, or law has been or can be examined, challenged, or ruled upon by a judicial authority.
-
D.
legalStatusOfProceedings
Indicates the current legal standing or condition of a set of legal proceedings within a judicial or administrative process.
-
E.
defendantStatus
Indicates the legal condition or standing of a defendant within a judicial or law-enforcement process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e3e0c7c8190b30d278845e2497e |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f12aab3d2c81908a3b5a5c127c4aac |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e71b48576c8190a8e93738fd9cfda5 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 6:38 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:35 p.m.