Triple
T22118469
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Non-constituency Member of Parliament |
E546599
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportingArgument |
P2397
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ensures alternative voices in a dominant-party system |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ensures alternative voices in a dominant-party system | Statement: [Non-constituency Member of Parliament, supportingArgument, ensures alternative voices in a dominant-party system]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportingArgument Context triple: [Non-constituency Member of Parliament, supportingArgument, ensures alternative voices in a dominant-party system]
-
A.
supportAgainst
Indicates providing help, resources, or advocacy to oppose or resist a particular target, threat, or adversary.
-
B.
defenseArgument
Indicates that an entity presents or supports a line of reasoning intended to defend or justify another entity, often in a legal or argumentative context.
-
C.
arguesThat
chosen
Indicates that one entity presents reasons or justification in support of a specific claim, position, or proposition held about another entity or topic.
-
D.
argumentOf
Indicates that one entity functions as an argument (participant or operand) in relation to another entity, such as a predicate, event, or expression.
-
E.
supportsTheory
Indicates that one entity provides evidence, justification, or endorsement for the validity or acceptance of another entity’s theory.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e38b3848190ac3a4fa97d56e65a |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1294fcf2c81909b610e03a0f1921f |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e71b2ed7348190b6fa2e52f54393fb |
completed | April 21, 2026, 6:37 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:31 p.m.