Triple
T21620185
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976 |
E533554
|
entity |
| Predicate | partiallyInvalidatedBy |
P14663
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Supreme Court of India in Minerva Mills judgment |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Supreme Court of India in Minerva Mills judgment | Statement: [Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, partiallyInvalidatedBy, Supreme Court of India in Minerva Mills judgment]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Supreme Court of India in Minerva Mills judgment Context triple: [Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, partiallyInvalidatedBy, Supreme Court of India in Minerva Mills judgment]
-
A.
Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India
chosen
Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India is a landmark 1980 judgment of the Supreme Court of India that reaffirmed and strengthened the basic structure doctrine by limiting Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution.
-
B.
I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab
I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab is a landmark 1967 Indian Supreme Court case that held Parliament could not amend fundamental rights under the Constitution, sharply limiting its amending power until this view was later modified.
-
C.
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala is a landmark 1973 Supreme Court of India judgment that established the basic structure doctrine, limiting Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution.
-
D.
S. R. Bommai v. Union of India
S. R. Bommai v. Union of India is a landmark 1994 Supreme Court of India judgment that curtailed the arbitrary use of President’s Rule and strengthened federalism by applying the basic structure doctrine to center-state relations.
-
E.
T. M. A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka
T. M. A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka is a landmark 2002 Supreme Court of India judgment that redefined the constitutional rights of private and minority educational institutions regarding establishment, administration, and state regulation.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c464fba881908d0ff2ac80511ce1 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ef3baeeae48190b78583b3bec8ee33 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 10:34 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:34 p.m.