Triple
T21533915
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | General District Courts of Virginia |
E531300
|
entity |
| Predicate | standardOfProofCriminal |
P6737
|
FINISHED |
| Object | beyond a reasonable doubt |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: beyond a reasonable doubt | Statement: [General District Courts of Virginia, standardOfProofCriminal, beyond a reasonable doubt]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: standardOfProofCriminal Context triple: [General District Courts of Virginia, standardOfProofCriminal, beyond a reasonable doubt]
-
A.
standardOfProof
chosen
Indicates the level or degree of certainty required to establish that a claim or allegation is true in a given context.
-
B.
reasonForConviction
Indicates the specific offense or legal basis for which an individual was found guilty or convicted.
-
C.
requiredConvictionThreshold
Indicates the minimum level of certainty or confidence that must be reached before a particular decision, judgment, or action is considered justified or allowed.
-
D.
convictedBy
Indicates that an authority, typically a court or judge, has formally found an entity guilty of a crime or offense.
-
E.
convictionJurisdiction
Indicates the legal authority or geographic area under whose jurisdiction a conviction was issued.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c45e5b8881908ac18fc2f493b114 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ee9d0b9888819094e424d33c14d5d0 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e6320766308190ba5dca2f7c826aa4 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:27 p.m.