Triple
T2101524
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Turkic languages |
E37102
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Altaic language group (disputed) |
C9837
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Altaic language group (disputed) Context triple: [Turkic languages, instanceOf, Altaic language group (disputed)]
-
A.
Turkic language
A Turkic language is a member of a family of closely related languages spoken across a vast area from Eastern Europe and Anatolia through Central Asia to Siberia and Western China, characterized by agglutinative morphology, vowel harmony, and similar grammatical structures.
-
B.
Austroasiatic language
An Austroasiatic language is a member of a large language family native to Southeast Asia and parts of South Asia, including languages such as Vietnamese, Khmer, and Mon.
-
C.
Sino-Tibetan language
A Sino-Tibetan language is any member of a large language family, including Chinese and Tibeto-Burman languages, characterized by shared historical origins in East and Southeast Asia and often featuring tonal systems and analytic grammar.
-
D.
Uralic language
A Uralic language is a member of the Uralic language family, originating in Northern Eurasia and characterized by features such as agglutinative morphology, extensive case systems, and vowel harmony, including languages like Finnish, Hungarian, and Estonian.
-
E.
Japonic languages
Japonic languages are a small language family native to Japan and nearby regions, including Japanese and the Ryukyuan languages, characterized by shared grammatical structures and historical origins.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8861828948190924aa30c08806b3a |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:43 p.m.