Triple
T20342659
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bhartṛhari’s school of sphoṭa theory |
E495779
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | linguistic-philosophical tradition |
C7898
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: linguistic-philosophical tradition Context triple: [Bhartṛhari’s school of sphoṭa theory, instanceOf, linguistic-philosophical tradition]
-
A.
linguistic tradition
chosen
A linguistic tradition is the historically developed and culturally shared system of language practices, norms, and conventions that shape how a community speaks, writes, and interprets meaning over time.
-
B.
linguistic philosopher
A linguistic philosopher is a thinker who analyzes how language shapes meaning, thought, and reality, often examining the structure, use, and limits of linguistic expressions to clarify philosophical problems.
-
C.
metaphysical tradition
A metaphysical tradition is a historically and culturally situated body of teachings, practices, and assumptions that systematically explores and explains the fundamental nature of reality, being, and existence beyond empirical observation.
-
D.
analytic philosopher
An analytic philosopher is a thinker who approaches philosophical problems through precise argumentation, logical analysis, and careful examination of language and concepts.
-
E.
doctrine of logical positivism
The doctrine of logical positivism is a philosophical view that holds only empirically verifiable statements and logical truths as meaningful, rejecting metaphysics and ethical claims as cognitively meaningless.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4a3320881909495ae8bc30bc2dc |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:24 a.m.