Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949) | Statement: [Julius A. Wolf, caseCitation, Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949)]

Target entity: Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949)
Context triple: [Julius A. Wolf, caseCitation, Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949)]

• A. Wolf v. Colorado chosen
  Wolf v. Colorado was a 1949 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Fourth Amendment’s exclusionary rule did not apply to the states, a position later reversed by Mapp v. Ohio.
• B. Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock
  Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock is a 1903 U.S. Supreme Court decision that affirmed broad congressional power over Native American tribes, effectively endorsing unilateral alteration of treaties and becoming a cornerstone of federal Indian law.
• C. Durousseau v. United States
  Durousseau v. United States is an 1810 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of federal judicial power by interpreting Congress’s authority to make exceptions and regulations to the Court’s appellate jurisdiction.
• D. Wright v. United States
  Wright v. United States is a 1938 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of presidential veto power and the constitutional requirements for lawmaking under the Presentment Clause.
• E. Wilson v. New (1917)
  Wilson v. New (1917) was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal authority to regulate railroad workers’ hours and wages, affirming the constitutionality of progressive labor legislation.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.