Triple

T19961434
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Texas v. New Mexico E479822 entity
Predicate citation P771 FINISHED
Object Texas v. New Mexico, 138 S. Ct. 954 (2018) — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Texas v. New Mexico, 138 S. Ct. 954 (2018) | Statement: [Texas v. New Mexico, citation, Texas v. New Mexico, 138 S. Ct. 954 (2018)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Texas v. New Mexico, 138 S. Ct. 954 (2018)
Context triple: [Texas v. New Mexico, citation, Texas v. New Mexico, 138 S. Ct. 954 (2018)]
  • A. Texas v. New Mexico chosen
    Texas v. New Mexico is a U.S. Supreme Court interstate water rights case involving disputes over allocation and enforcement of river water compacts between the states.
  • B. United States v. Texas (2021)
    United States v. Texas (2021) is a U.S. Supreme Court case challenging the constitutionality and enforcement mechanism of Texas’s restrictive abortion law known as Senate Bill 8.
  • C. California v. Texas
    California v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act after Congress reduced the individual mandate penalty to zero.
  • D. Bullcoming v. New Mexico
    Bullcoming v. New Mexico is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the Confrontation Clause by holding that defendants have the right to cross-examine the specific analyst who prepared a forensic laboratory report used as evidence against them.
  • E. Alabama v. Texas
    Alabama v. Texas is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court addressed a dispute among states over offshore submerged lands and the scope of federal authority under the Constitution.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e523c19881909f9197037200dde6 completed April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e65af4520c81909986a47289ba801e completed April 20, 2026, 4:57 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:54 p.m.