Triple

T19772809
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lipitor E474929 entity
Predicate hasGeneric P125213 FINISHED
Object atorvastatin generic formulations LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: atorvastatin generic formulations | Statement: [Lipitor, hasGeneric, atorvastatin generic formulations]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasGeneric
Context triple: [Lipitor, hasGeneric, atorvastatin generic formulations]
  • A. hasGenericName
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a non-brand, generic name that designates its general type or class.
  • B. isGenericOver
    Indicates that one entity is defined or parameterized in terms of another, more specific entity, such that it can operate over or apply to that entity as a generic.
  • C. isGenericAvailable chosen
    Indicates that a non-brand (generic) version of a product, typically a medication, is available as an alternative.
  • D. hasTypeGenus
    Indicates that one entity is the type genus that formally defines or represents the taxonomic group of the other entity.
  • E. isGenericConstraintExample
    Indicates that one entity serves as an example or illustration of a generic type constraint applied to another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e51a43a08190956bc6df13c91a77 completed April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6535ce4d08190a1dfca2df95a8631 completed April 20, 2026, 4:25 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e53053ed2881908400becdfada7fd3 completed April 19, 2026, 7:43 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:48 p.m.