Triple

T19715872
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject neutral theory of population genetics E473474 entity
Predicate providesModelFor P28233 FINISHED
Object expected site frequency spectrum under neutrality LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: expected site frequency spectrum under neutrality | Statement: [neutral theory of population genetics, providesModelFor, expected site frequency spectrum under neutrality]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: providesModelFor
Context triple: [neutral theory of population genetics, providesModelFor, expected site frequency spectrum under neutrality]
  • A. introducedForModel
    Indicates that one entity was created, proposed, or brought into use specifically for application within a particular model.
  • B. possibleModel
    Indicates that one entity can serve as a potential or candidate model or template for another entity.
  • C. planningModelFor
    Indicates that one entity serves as a planning model used to guide, simulate, or structure the planning activities related to another entity.
  • D. isModelOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as a representation or abstraction that captures the structure or behavior of another entity.
  • E. producedModel
    Indicates that one entity created, manufactured, or generated the other entity as a model or product.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e516dd048190a0b6c93ea3e71f58 completed April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6440cb47c81908124dfbd6f781d23 completed April 20, 2026, 3:19 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e530438c60819082364c7be3eef6f0 completed April 19, 2026, 7:42 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:46 p.m.