Triple

T19567650
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Apologies of Justin Martyr E489624 entity
Predicate defendsPractice P40990 FINISHED
Object Christian worship LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Christian worship | Statement: [Apologies of Justin Martyr, defendsPractice, Christian worship]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: defendsPractice
Context triple: [Apologies of Justin Martyr, defendsPractice, Christian worship]
  • A. defends
    Indicates that one entity protects or supports another entity against attack, criticism, or harm.
  • B. defendedWork
    Indicates that one entity formally supported or justified the work, ideas, or output of another entity, typically in response to criticism or evaluation.
  • C. defendedAs
    Indicates that one entity is presented, argued, or justified as being equivalent to or serving the role of another entity in a defensive or protective context.
  • D. defendsConcept chosen
    Indicates that one entity actively supports and argues in favor of a particular concept, idea, or theory, often in response to criticism or challenge.
  • E. defendedLawProvision
    Indicates that an entity actively supported or argued in favor of a specific provision within a law, typically in a legal or legislative context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8dc5d8c8190a6d7bd8864f43ca0 completed April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e63f79adf08190b1c0b008f30b0acd completed April 20, 2026, 3 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e514d4df3c8190b7e9b3b4fdf9452a completed April 19, 2026, 5:45 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:42 p.m.