Triple

T19543013
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Treaty 11 E488955 entity
Predicate hasOngoingIssues P136718 FINISHED
Object disputes over interpretation of land and resource rights LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: disputes over interpretation of land and resource rights | Statement: [Treaty 11, hasOngoingIssues, disputes over interpretation of land and resource rights]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOngoingIssues
Context triple: [Treaty 11, hasOngoingIssues, disputes over interpretation of land and resource rights]
  • A. hasRecentIssue
    Indicates that an entity is associated with an issue or problem that has occurred within a recent or specified time frame.
  • B. hasIssueWith
    Indicates that one entity experiences a problem, conflict, or concern related to another entity.
  • C. hasBackIssues
    Indicates that an entity experiences or possesses problems, conditions, or complications related to its back.
  • D. hasOngoing
    Indicates that one entity is currently engaged in, experiencing, or maintaining an activity, state, or process that has not yet concluded.
  • E. containsIssue
    Indicates that one entity includes, encompasses, or has within it a particular issue, problem, or defect.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8db5b6c8190984b61f91981f575 completed April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e638750b288190aecdb0e18a1add62 completed April 20, 2026, 2:30 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e514c9c00481909b76bda67957e58b completed April 19, 2026, 5:45 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e51a23300c8190988552491d9783d7 completed April 19, 2026, 6:08 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:41 p.m.