Triple
T19322805
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Liebestod |
E483268
|
entity |
| Predicate | harmonicInnovation |
P32322
|
FINISHED |
| Object | delayed resolution |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: delayed resolution | Statement: [Liebestod, harmonicInnovation, delayed resolution]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: harmonicInnovation Context triple: [Liebestod, harmonicInnovation, delayed resolution]
-
A.
usesHarmonics
Indicates that one entity employs harmonic frequencies or overtones of another entity or signal as part of its operation or behavior.
-
B.
harmonicLanguage
Indicates a relationship where one entity uses or is characterized by a system of musical harmony or tonal organization associated with another entity.
-
C.
hasHarmony
Indicates that two or more entities are in a state of balance, agreement, or pleasing coordination with one another.
-
D.
usesHarmony
Indicates that one entity employs or incorporates harmony—such as coordinated or consonant combinations of elements—in relation to another entity or context.
-
E.
innovationFrom
chosen
Indicates that something originates, arises, or is derived as an innovation from a particular source or prior entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d13e3c81909d91d1d5ec37c095 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e60d8948948190b76a384041333509 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 11:27 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4dd0ef66881909d489d634eee817a |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:32 p.m.