Triple
T18971388
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Great Sioux Reservation |
E464176
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalDispute |
P3996
|
FINISHED |
| Object | United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians | Statement: [Great Sioux Reservation, legalDispute, United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians Context triple: [Great Sioux Reservation, legalDispute, United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians]
-
A.
Ex parte Crow Dog
Ex parte Crow Dog is an 1883 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed tribal sovereignty by holding that federal courts lacked jurisdiction over crimes committed by one Native American against another on tribal land.
-
B.
Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States
Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States is a 1955 U.S. Supreme Court case that denied compensable property rights to an Alaska Native group by relying on the Doctrine of Discovery to limit Indigenous land claims.
-
C.
United States Supreme Court decision United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians
chosen
United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians is a landmark 1980 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the federal government had unlawfully taken the Black Hills from the Sioux, awarding monetary compensation for the violation of their treaty rights.
-
D.
Osage Nation Courts
Osage Nation Courts are the judicial branch of the Osage Nation, responsible for interpreting and applying tribal law and administering justice within the Osage reservation.
-
E.
Johnson v. M’Intosh
Johnson v. M’Intosh is an 1823 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the doctrine that private individuals could not purchase lands directly from Native Americans, affirming federal supremacy over Indian land transactions and shaping American property and Indigenous land rights law.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dd008af48190a97ff1c6488edf1b |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5d61a8bbc8190881908a71e0f2a53 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, noon