Triple

T18791217
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Insertion sort E459517 entity
Predicate bestCaseInput P133029 FINISHED
Object already sorted array LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: already sorted array | Statement: [Insertion sort, bestCaseInput, already sorted array]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: bestCaseInput
Context triple: [Insertion sort, bestCaseInput, already sorted array]
  • A. bestForward
    Indicates that the subject is considered the most effective or outstanding forward (e.g., in an offensive or attacking role) relative to a given group or context.
  • B. bestOf
    Indicates that one entity is the top-ranked or most outstanding member within a specified group, set, or collection.
  • C. bestKnownSingle
    Indicates that the referenced item is the most prominent or widely recognized single associated with an entity (such as an artist or group).
  • D. bestObservedWith
    Indicates that one entity is most effectively or appropriately observed, detected, or measured when used or considered together with another specified entity.
  • E. holdsBestFor
    Indicates that one entity considers or maintains another entity as the most suitable or optimal choice for a particular purpose or context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8d396f54c8190ba49db31e8743842 completed April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5978665388190aaefed0ec30a1ff3 completed April 20, 2026, 3:03 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e48d16dd34819096e096d0c0e4c15c completed April 19, 2026, 8:06 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e49785fd7081909577e90a55df0a35 completed April 19, 2026, 8:51 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:53 a.m.