Triple
T1868484
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Storm King Mountain |
E34976
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalPrecedent |
P18766
|
FINISHED |
| Object | helped establish standing for environmental groups in federal court |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: helped establish standing for environmental groups in federal court | Statement: [Storm King Mountain, legalPrecedent, helped establish standing for environmental groups in federal court]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalPrecedent Context triple: [Storm King Mountain, legalPrecedent, helped establish standing for environmental groups in federal court]
-
A.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
B.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
-
C.
legalOutcome
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
-
D.
hasCourtPrecedence
chosen
Indicates that one court decision or ruling holds authoritative priority over another in legal reasoning or application.
-
E.
legalCitation
Indicates that one legal document, case, or authority formally references or cites another as a source of legal support or precedent.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88600b2f88190bc09303e68ab517e |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb16c09e48190a345c95eab59fd87 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:02 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abafe02c3c819093a4744b476106ca |
completed | March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:34 p.m.