Triple

T18619527
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject COP15 Accord E455111 entity
Predicate includesCommitmentType P445 FINISHED
Object political commitments LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: political commitments | Statement: [COP15 Accord, includesCommitmentType, political commitments]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includesCommitmentType
Context triple: [COP15 Accord, includesCommitmentType, political commitments]
  • A. coreCommitment
    Indicates a fundamental, central obligation or promise that defines the primary responsibility or dedication within a relationship or agreement.
  • B. guaranteeCommitments
    Indicates a relationship where one party formally assures that specific obligations or promises made to another party will be fulfilled or upheld.
  • C. commitmentGrade
    Indicates the level or quality of commitment one entity has made toward another entity or agreed-upon action.
  • D. hasCommitteeType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a committee of a specified type or classification.
  • E. obligationType chosen
    Indicates the specific kind or category of duty, requirement, or commitment that applies within an obligation relationship.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8d38bbe7c8190bdec3138e7d413c9 completed April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e54d07dc288190bb3b8b5ab06518da completed April 19, 2026, 9:45 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e478d4a7948190a4bb9223bb5dddfc completed April 19, 2026, 6:40 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:46 a.m.