Triple
T18348428
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cook v. Gralike |
E439602
|
entity |
| Predicate | fullCaseName |
P3131
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Donald G. Cook, Secretary of State of Missouri v. Don Gralike |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Donald G. Cook, Secretary of State of Missouri v. Don Gralike | Statement: [Cook v. Gralike, fullCaseName, Donald G. Cook, Secretary of State of Missouri v. Don Gralike]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Donald G. Cook, Secretary of State of Missouri v. Don Gralike Context triple: [Cook v. Gralike, fullCaseName, Donald G. Cook, Secretary of State of Missouri v. Don Gralike]
-
A.
Cummings v. Missouri
Cummings v. Missouri was an 1867 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down post–Civil War loyalty oath requirements as unconstitutional bills of attainder and ex post facto laws.
-
B.
Coppage v. Kansas
Coppage v. Kansas is a 1915 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a state law banning “yellow-dog” contracts, reflecting the Lochner-era emphasis on freedom of contract over labor protections.
-
C.
Cook v. Gralike
chosen
Cook v. Gralike is a 2001 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited states’ power over federal elections by holding that Missouri could not use ballot notations to influence voters’ choices for congressional candidates.
-
D.
Lafler v. Cooper
Lafler v. Cooper is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that held defendants can obtain relief for ineffective assistance of counsel during plea bargaining when bad legal advice leads them to reject a favorable plea offer.
-
E.
South Dakota v. Dole
South Dakota v. Dole is a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power to condition federal highway funds on states adopting a minimum drinking age of 21, helping define the scope of the federal spending power.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9175fec8190af865699b4e64d8c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e514f66a4c8190a0ba53d3b349178a |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:37 a.m.