Triple

T18348334
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Smiley v. Holm E439599 entity
Predicate isCitedIn P771 FINISHED
Object Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission | Statement: [Smiley v. Holm, isCitedIn, Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission
Context triple: [Smiley v. Holm, isCitedIn, Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission]
  • A. Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission chosen
    Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission is a 2015 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of using an independent commission, rather than the state legislature, to draw congressional district boundaries.
  • B. Arizona v. Johnson
    Arizona v. Johnson is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified police authority to frisk passengers during lawful traffic stops when officers reasonably suspect they are armed and dangerous.
  • C. Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee
    Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the scope of federal protections against voting discrimination, particularly under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
  • D. Rucho v. Common Cause
    Rucho v. Common Cause is a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that claims of partisan gerrymandering present political questions beyond the reach of federal courts.
  • E. Arizona v. Evans
    Arizona v. Evans is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule to evidence obtained through an arrest based on erroneous computer records.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b9175fec8190af865699b4e64d8c completed April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e514f66a4c8190a0ba53d3b349178a completed April 19, 2026, 5:46 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:37 a.m.