Triple

T18348226
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Elections Clause E439597 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Rucho v. Common Cause NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rucho v. Common Cause | Statement: [Elections Clause, relatedCase, Rucho v. Common Cause]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Rucho v. Common Cause
Context triple: [Elections Clause, relatedCase, Rucho v. Common Cause]
  • A. McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission
    McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down aggregate limits on individual contributions to federal political campaigns as a violation of the First Amendment.
  • B. Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee
    Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the scope of federal protections against voting discrimination, particularly under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
  • C. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a landmark 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that dramatically expanded the political spending rights of corporations and unions by treating such expenditures as protected speech.
  • D. McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
    McConnell v. Federal Election Commission is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that largely upheld the constitutionality of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (McCain–Feingold Act), significantly shaping modern campaign finance law.
  • E. Davis v. Federal Election Commission
    Davis v. Federal Election Commission is a 2008 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the “millionaire’s amendment” to federal campaign finance law as an unconstitutional burden on self-financed candidates’ First Amendment rights.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Rucho v. Common Cause
Target entity description: Rucho v. Common Cause is a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that claims of partisan gerrymandering present political questions beyond the reach of federal courts.
  • A. McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission
    McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down aggregate limits on individual contributions to federal political campaigns as a violation of the First Amendment.
  • B. Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee
    Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the scope of federal protections against voting discrimination, particularly under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
  • C. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a landmark 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that dramatically expanded the political spending rights of corporations and unions by treating such expenditures as protected speech.
  • D. McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
    McConnell v. Federal Election Commission is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that largely upheld the constitutionality of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (McCain–Feingold Act), significantly shaping modern campaign finance law.
  • E. Davis v. Federal Election Commission
    Davis v. Federal Election Commission is a 2008 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the “millionaire’s amendment” to federal campaign finance law as an unconstitutional burden on self-financed candidates’ First Amendment rights.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b9175fec8190af865699b4e64d8c completed April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e514f594f88190a683e6224e091593 completed April 19, 2026, 5:46 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:37 a.m.