Triple

T18127608
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Dow Theory E433917 entity
Predicate trendClassification P5318 FINISHED
Object primary trend LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: primary trend | Statement: [Dow Theory, trendClassification, primary trend]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: trendClassification
Context triple: [Dow Theory, trendClassification, primary trend]
  • A. marketClassification
    Indicates how an entity is categorized or segmented within a particular market or market structure.
  • B. hasTrend chosen
    Indicates that something exhibits or is associated with a particular pattern of change or direction over time.
  • C. trends
    Indicates that one entity exhibits a general direction of change or development over time in relation to another reference or context.
  • D. classificationAccordingTo
    Indicates that an entity is assigned a particular class, type, or category as defined or determined by a specified source, standard, or authority.
  • E. classificationConsensus
    Indicates that multiple agents or sources agree on the same classification or category assignment for a given entity or item.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b909e8cc81908df4cc2b8ea6d11f completed April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4ddef4cd88190b16ef0d6ed3968c6 completed April 19, 2026, 1:51 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e43313ca788190baa224269e71de49 completed April 19, 2026, 1:42 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:29 a.m.