Triple
T17954556
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla decision |
E448911
|
entity |
| Predicate | citation |
P771
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla, (1976) 2 SCC 521 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla, (1976) 2 SCC 521 | Statement: [ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla decision, citation, ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla, (1976) 2 SCC 521]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla, (1976) 2 SCC 521 Context triple: [ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla decision, citation, ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla, (1976) 2 SCC 521]
-
A.
ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla decision
chosen
The ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla decision was a controversial 1976 Indian Supreme Court ruling during the Emergency that held citizens had no locus to challenge unlawful detentions when fundamental rights were suspended, later widely criticized and effectively overruled.
-
B.
S. S. Dhanoa v. Union of India
S. S. Dhanoa v. Union of India is a Supreme Court of India judgment that examined the constitutional status, powers, and independence of the Election Commission and its officers in the context of electoral administration.
-
C.
S. R. Bommai v. Union of India
S. R. Bommai v. Union of India is a landmark 1994 Supreme Court of India judgment that curtailed the arbitrary use of President’s Rule and strengthened federalism by applying the basic structure doctrine to center-state relations.
-
D.
L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India
L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India is a landmark 1997 Supreme Court of India judgment that reaffirmed judicial review as part of the Constitution’s basic structure and held that decisions of tribunals are subject to scrutiny by High Courts under Articles 226 and 227.
-
E.
Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan
Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan is a 1965 Indian Supreme Court case that examined the scope of Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution, particularly fundamental rights, under Article 368.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9f8cca8819099836916c56b7c95 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4afaf1ddc8190b480147ac35a4912 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:34 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:21 a.m.