Triple
T17661912
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hirabayashi curfew holding |
E440272
|
entity |
| Predicate | subsequentView |
P128443
|
FINISHED |
| Object | widely regarded as a low point in civil liberties jurisprudence |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: widely regarded as a low point in civil liberties jurisprudence | Statement: [Hirabayashi curfew holding, subsequentView, widely regarded as a low point in civil liberties jurisprudence]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: subsequentView Context triple: [Hirabayashi curfew holding, subsequentView, widely regarded as a low point in civil liberties jurisprudence]
-
A.
viewOnHereafter
Indicates a subject’s beliefs, opinions, or perspective regarding the afterlife or what happens after death.
-
B.
subsequentAction
Indicates that one action occurs after another in time, following it as a later step or consequence.
-
C.
subsequentDocument
Indicates that one document follows another in sequence, typically as a later or next installment, version, or related record.
-
D.
intendedView
Indicates that one entity is the target or preferred perspective, representation, or display mode through which another entity is meant to be viewed or presented.
-
E.
subsequentCase
Indicates that one legal case follows another in time or procedural order, often relying on or referencing the earlier case.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9e87e18819087104a44dc4dc5b1 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e46ea67f8081909da164ca21a98675 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:56 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3cde007d8819090dd92eea9f022cc |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e3cfaac2b881909e1140339eb1a0dd |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:38 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 9:43 a.m.