Triple
T17661899
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hirabayashi curfew holding |
E440272
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedCase |
P3137
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Yasui v. United States |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Yasui v. United States | Statement: [Hirabayashi curfew holding, relatedCase, Yasui v. United States]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Yasui v. United States Context triple: [Hirabayashi curfew holding, relatedCase, Yasui v. United States]
-
A.
Yasui v. United States
chosen
Yasui v. United States was a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the wartime conviction of Minoru Yasui for violating a military-imposed curfew on Japanese Americans, thereby affirming the government’s authority to restrict their civil liberties during World War II.
-
B.
Hirabayashi v. United States
Hirabayashi v. United States is a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the wartime curfew and restrictions imposed on Japanese Americans during World War II.
-
C.
Yates v. United States
Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
-
D.
Fong Yue Ting v. United States
Fong Yue Ting v. United States is an 1893 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld broad federal authority over immigration, affirming the government's power to deport non-citizens without full constitutional protections.
-
E.
Hawaii v. Mankichi
Hawaii v. Mankichi is a 1903 U.S. Supreme Court decision addressing the application of constitutional criminal procedure protections in newly annexed U.S. territories, particularly regarding jury trial and grand jury requirements in Hawaii.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9e87e18819087104a44dc4dc5b1 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e46ea67f8081909da164ca21a98675 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:56 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 9:43 a.m.