Triple
T1764050
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Worcester v. Georgia |
E38721
|
entity |
| Predicate | backgroundLaw |
P16442
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Indian Trade and Intercourse Acts
The Indian Trade and Intercourse Acts were a series of U.S. federal laws enacted from the late 18th century to regulate trade with Native American tribes and assert federal, rather than state, authority over Indian affairs and territory.
|
E196857
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (5 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Indian Trade and Intercourse Acts | Statement: [Worcester v. Georgia, backgroundLaw, Indian Trade and Intercourse Acts]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Indian Trade and Intercourse Acts Context triple: [Worcester v. Georgia, backgroundLaw, Indian Trade and Intercourse Acts]
-
A.
Revestment Act 1765
The Revestment Act 1765 was a British law by which the British Crown purchased and absorbed the feudal rights of the Lords of Mann, bringing the Isle of Man under more direct royal control.
-
B.
Quartering Act
The Quartering Act was a controversial law passed by the British Parliament requiring American colonists to provide housing and supplies for British soldiers, contributing significantly to rising colonial resentment before the American Revolution.
-
C.
Tariff Act of 1790
The Tariff Act of 1790 was an early U.S. federal law that established import duties to fund the national government and support maritime enforcement, laying groundwork for the young nation's customs and revenue system.
-
D.
Indian Act
The Indian Act is a Canadian federal law that has long governed and controlled many aspects of First Nations peoples’ lives, including their status, lands, and governance.
-
E.
Indian Reorganization Act
The Indian Reorganization Act was a 1934 U.S. federal law that ended the allotment of Native American lands, promoted tribal self-government, and aimed to restore and protect tribal land bases and cultures.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Indian Trade and Intercourse Acts Triple: [Worcester v. Georgia, backgroundLaw, Indian Trade and Intercourse Acts]
Generated description
The Indian Trade and Intercourse Acts were a series of U.S. federal laws enacted from the late 18th century to regulate trade with Native American tribes and assert federal, rather than state, authority over Indian affairs and territory.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Indian Trade and Intercourse Acts Target entity description: The Indian Trade and Intercourse Acts were a series of U.S. federal laws enacted from the late 18th century to regulate trade with Native American tribes and assert federal, rather than state, authority over Indian affairs and territory.
-
A.
Revestment Act 1765
The Revestment Act 1765 was a British law by which the British Crown purchased and absorbed the feudal rights of the Lords of Mann, bringing the Isle of Man under more direct royal control.
-
B.
Quartering Act
The Quartering Act was a controversial law passed by the British Parliament requiring American colonists to provide housing and supplies for British soldiers, contributing significantly to rising colonial resentment before the American Revolution.
-
C.
Tariff Act of 1790
The Tariff Act of 1790 was an early U.S. federal law that established import duties to fund the national government and support maritime enforcement, laying groundwork for the young nation's customs and revenue system.
-
D.
Indian Act
The Indian Act is a Canadian federal law that has long governed and controlled many aspects of First Nations peoples’ lives, including their status, lands, and governance.
-
E.
Indian Reorganization Act
The Indian Reorganization Act was a 1934 U.S. federal law that ended the allotment of Native American lands, promoted tribal self-government, and aimed to restore and protect tribal land bases and cultures.
- F. None of above. chosen
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: backgroundLaw Context triple: [Worcester v. Georgia, backgroundLaw, Indian Trade and Intercourse Acts]
-
A.
legalBackground
Indicates that an entity has education, training, or experience related to law or the legal profession.
-
B.
law
chosen
Indicates that one entity establishes, embodies, or enforces a rule or system of rules governing the behavior or relations of another entity.
-
C.
legalArea
Indicates the specific field or branch of law that a legal matter, case, or document pertains to.
-
D.
legalSubject
Indicates that an entity is the bearer of legal rights, duties, or responsibilities within a legal relationship or context.
-
E.
lawJournal
Indicates a relationship where a work is published in, associated with, or appears within a specific law journal.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (6 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8862d562481908d7025a1c1f67c0d |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ab173936b4819097332ee185996bbd |
completed | March 6, 2026, 6:04 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ada0f12fd8819099759ebcdfc19494 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:16 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69ada1e3587c8190bca329c68ff31c41 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:20 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69ada2977bfc8190ad028e17184fccaa |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aa61c9e06c819085489e00cfe72153 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:31 p.m.