Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: The First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting corporate independent expenditures related to ballot initiatives based on the corporate identity of the speaker. | Statement: [First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, holding, The First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting corporate independent expenditures related to ballot initiatives based on the corporate identity of the speaker.]

Target entity: The First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting corporate independent expenditures related to ballot initiatives based on the corporate identity of the speaker.
Context triple: [First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, holding, The First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting corporate independent expenditures related to ballot initiatives based on the corporate identity of the speaker.]

• A. United States federal campaign finance law
  United States federal campaign finance law is the body of statutes and regulations that governs how money is raised and spent in federal elections, including rules on contributions, disclosures, and political spending by individuals, parties, and organizations.
• B. McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
  McConnell v. Federal Election Commission is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that largely upheld the constitutionality of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (McCain–Feingold Act), significantly shaping modern campaign finance law.
• C. Incorporation doctrine
  The Incorporation doctrine is a constitutional principle through which most protections in the U.S. Bill of Rights have been made enforceable against state governments via the Fourteenth Amendment.
• D. Buckley v. Valeo
  Buckley v. Valeo is a landmark 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reshaped campaign finance law by equating certain limits on political spending with restrictions on free speech under the First Amendment.
• E. McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission
  McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down aggregate limits on individual contributions to federal political campaigns as a violation of the First Amendment.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: The First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting corporate independent expenditures related to ballot initiatives based on the corporate identity of the speaker.
Target entity description: This entity is a constitutional law principle, established in First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, recognizing that corporations have First Amendment protection to spend independently on ballot initiatives regardless of their corporate status.

• A. United States federal campaign finance law
  United States federal campaign finance law is the body of statutes and regulations that governs how money is raised and spent in federal elections, including rules on contributions, disclosures, and political spending by individuals, parties, and organizations.
• B. McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
  McConnell v. Federal Election Commission is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that largely upheld the constitutionality of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (McCain–Feingold Act), significantly shaping modern campaign finance law.
• C. Incorporation doctrine
  The Incorporation doctrine is a constitutional principle through which most protections in the U.S. Bill of Rights have been made enforceable against state governments via the Fourteenth Amendment.
• D. Buckley v. Valeo
  Buckley v. Valeo is a landmark 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reshaped campaign finance law by equating certain limits on political spending with restrictions on free speech under the First Amendment.
• E. McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission
  McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down aggregate limits on individual contributions to federal political campaigns as a violation of the First Amendment.
• F. None of above. chosen