Triple
T17042422
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lynn Fitch |
E413476
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalArgumentPositionInDobbs |
P15326
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Roe v. Wade should be overturned |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Roe v. Wade should be overturned | Statement: [Lynn Fitch, legalArgumentPositionInDobbs, Roe v. Wade should be overturned]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalArgumentPositionInDobbs Context triple: [Lynn Fitch, legalArgumentPositionInDobbs, Roe v. Wade should be overturned]
-
A.
arguedUnder
Indicates that one entity presented arguments or conducted a legal case under the supervision, authority, or guidance of another entity (such as a mentor, attorney, or judge).
-
B.
legalDoctrineChallenged
chosen
Indicates that a particular legal doctrine is being disputed, questioned, or contested, typically through litigation or formal legal argument.
-
C.
defendantPosition
Indicates the role, stance, or location that a defendant holds within a legal case or proceeding.
-
D.
arguedDate
Indicates the date on which an argument, debate, or legal case was formally presented or argued.
-
E.
yearArguedBeforeSupremeCourt
Indicates the specific year in which a case was argued before the Supreme Court.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886cd18288190b006abab23f811b7 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3d8f771608190b596138ddec118c6 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 7:18 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e35d60a588819084f53ef9f8b2e7c0 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 10:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:33 a.m.