Triple
T16988556
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Second Hague Peace Conference |
E412131
|
entity |
| Predicate | attemptedButFailedProposal |
P58224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | general limitation of armaments |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: general limitation of armaments | Statement: [Second Hague Peace Conference, attemptedButFailedProposal, general limitation of armaments]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: attemptedButFailedProposal Context triple: [Second Hague Peace Conference, attemptedButFailedProposal, general limitation of armaments]
-
A.
hasProposal
Indicates that an entity possesses, is associated with, or is the subject of a specific proposal.
-
B.
hasProposed
Indicates that one entity has formally suggested or put forward something (such as an idea, plan, or offer) to another entity for consideration or acceptance.
-
C.
hasProposedResolution
Indicates that an entity has put forward a specific resolution or solution for consideration or decision regarding another entity or issue.
-
D.
proposalOutcome
chosen
Indicates the result or status assigned to a proposal after it has been evaluated or decided upon.
-
E.
failedOn
Indicates that an attempted action or process did not succeed when applied to a specific target, condition, or step.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886ca8f348190812768ea8d5055ce |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3d27dca248190a9b73b16439d5631 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:50 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e35d4dff4881909b384e30f2d36bff |
completed | April 18, 2026, 10:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:32 a.m.