Triple

T16979379
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania E411901 entity
Predicate appliesLaw P125 FINISHED
Object Federal Rules of Evidence E13641 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Federal Rules of Evidence | Statement: [United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, appliesLaw, Federal Rules of Evidence]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Federal Rules of Evidence
Context triple: [United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, appliesLaw, Federal Rules of Evidence]
  • A. rules of evidence for the federal courts chosen
    The rules of evidence for the federal courts are a comprehensive set of legal standards that govern what information may be presented and considered in United States federal court proceedings.
  • B. Washington Rules of Evidence
    The Washington Rules of Evidence are a codified set of legal standards governing the admissibility and use of evidence in Washington State courts.
  • C. Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 603
    Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 603 is the U.S. evidentiary rule that requires witnesses to take an oath or affirmation to testify truthfully before giving evidence in court.
  • D. Federal Rule of Evidence 1006
    Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that allows parties to present the contents of voluminous writings, recordings, or photographs in the form of summaries, charts, or calculations when the originals would be too cumbersome to examine in court.
  • E. Federal Rule of Evidence 1007
    Federal Rule of Evidence 1007 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that allows a party to prove the contents of a writing, recording, or photograph through the testimony or written statement of the opposing party without producing the original.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d886ca8f348190812768ea8d5055ce completed April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e3d1866bf48190a0ea15c377bf782c completed April 18, 2026, 6:46 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a00d477f7ec81909f1f0243004c9050 completed May 10, 2026, 6:54 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:32 a.m.