Triple
T16708053
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Yana people |
E406023
|
entity |
| Predicate | subgroup |
P10
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Southern Yana |
E370848
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Southern Yana | Statement: [Yana people, subgroup, Southern Yana]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Southern Yana Context triple: [Yana people, subgroup, Southern Yana]
-
A.
Southern Yana
chosen
Southern Yana is a now-extinct dialect of the Yana language once spoken by Indigenous people in northern California.
-
B.
Northern Yana
Northern Yana is a now-extinct dialect of the Yana language once spoken by Indigenous people in northern California.
-
C.
Central Yana
Central Yana were a Native American group of the Yana people of northern California, culturally and linguistically related to the Yahi.
-
D.
Onon River region
The Onon River region is a historical area in northeastern Mongolia and southeastern Russia known as the traditional homeland of Genghis Khan and the early Mongol tribes.
-
E.
Northern Subanen
Northern Subanen is a major dialect of the Subanen language spoken by Subanen communities in the northern regions of the Zamboanga Peninsula in the southern Philippines.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8838db21081909589220fd71440a4 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e38337ecac8190bc4a9410ed7681ab |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:12 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a00a51378788190b9f3bb0a344dcdd8 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:20 a.m.