Triple
T16616233
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pickering v. Board of Education |
E403701
|
entity |
| Predicate | citedBy |
P771
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Garcetti v. Ceballos |
E666870
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Garcetti v. Ceballos | Statement: [Pickering v. Board of Education, citedBy, Garcetti v. Ceballos]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Garcetti v. Ceballos Context triple: [Pickering v. Board of Education, citedBy, Garcetti v. Ceballos]
-
A.
Garcetti v. Ceballos
chosen
Garcetti v. Ceballos is a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that public employees do not have First Amendment protection for speech made pursuant to their official job duties.
-
B.
Bucklew v. Precythe
Bucklew v. Precythe is a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld Missouri’s method of execution against an Eighth Amendment challenge, clarifying the standards for inmates claiming that a particular execution protocol would cause them severe pain.
-
C.
City of Boerne v. Flores
City of Boerne v. Flores is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that curtailed Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment and held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act could not be applied to the states.
-
D.
Van Orden v. Perry
Van Orden v. Perry is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of a Ten Commandments monument on Texas State Capitol grounds against an Establishment Clause challenge.
-
E.
Arizona v. Johnson
Arizona v. Johnson is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified police authority to frisk passengers during lawful traffic stops when officers reasonably suspect they are armed and dangerous.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d883897eb481909eaaa088ba9918d9 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e375494260819099b6988857c52dde |
completed | April 18, 2026, 12:12 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a007daef18481908c3628a3466300ce |
completed | May 10, 2026, 12:44 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:17 a.m.