Triple

T16616232
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Pickering v. Board of Education E403701 entity
Predicate citedBy P771 FINISHED
Object Connick v. Myers E666869 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Connick v. Myers | Statement: [Pickering v. Board of Education, citedBy, Connick v. Myers]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Connick v. Myers
Context triple: [Pickering v. Board of Education, citedBy, Connick v. Myers]
  • A. Connick v. Myers chosen
    Connick v. Myers is a 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited public employees’ First Amendment protections by holding that their speech is only constitutionally protected when it addresses matters of public concern rather than personal workplace grievances.
  • B. Meredith v. Fair
    Meredith v. Fair was a landmark federal court case that paved the way for James Meredith’s historic 1962 enrollment as the first Black student at the University of Mississippi, challenging entrenched racial segregation in higher education.
  • C. Myers v. United States
    Myers v. United States is a 1926 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly expanded presidential power by holding that the president has the exclusive authority to remove executive branch officials without Senate approval.
  • D. Argersinger v. Hamlin
    Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
  • E. Gooding v. Wilson
    Gooding v. Wilson is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the “fighting words” doctrine and struck down a Georgia statute as unconstitutionally overbroad under the First Amendment.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d883897eb481909eaaa088ba9918d9 completed April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e375494260819099b6988857c52dde completed April 18, 2026, 12:12 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a007daef18481908c3628a3466300ce completed May 10, 2026, 12:44 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:17 a.m.