Triple

T16214193
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject historic city of Asyut E393542 entity
Predicate languageOfHistoricalInscriptions P30358 FINISHED
Object Ancient Egyptian LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ancient Egyptian | Statement: [historic city of Asyut, languageOfHistoricalInscriptions, Ancient Egyptian]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageOfHistoricalInscriptions
Context triple: [historic city of Asyut, languageOfHistoricalInscriptions, Ancient Egyptian]
  • A. officialLanguageOfInscriptions
    Indicates the language officially used in the inscriptions associated with a particular entity.
  • B. secondaryLanguageOfInscriptions
    Indicates that a specified language serves as the secondary language used in the inscriptions associated with a given entity.
  • C. inscriptionsLanguage
    Indicates that the language used in the inscriptions on an object or surface is the specified language.
  • D. languageOfHistoricalRecord chosen
    Indicates the language in which a given historical record is written or recorded.
  • E. ancientLanguages
    Indicates that the related entities are languages that originated in and were used during ancient historical periods.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f1f5bd08190bd01cac0d5b9d2ef completed April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e227f393e08190be93400d754f0a2d completed April 17, 2026, 12:30 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e219e94a448190b73a4e6aa374eb4a completed April 17, 2026, 11:30 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:03 a.m.