Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International | Statement: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International]

Target entity: Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International
Context triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International]

• A. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion
  AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that the Federal Arbitration Act preempts state laws that deem class-action waivers in arbitration agreements unconscionable, thereby strengthening the enforceability of mandatory individual arbitration clauses.
• B. United States v. Microsoft Corp.
  United States v. Microsoft Corp. was a major U.S. antitrust lawsuit in the late 1990s and early 2000s that challenged Microsoft's dominance in the personal computer operating systems market, particularly its practices related to bundling Internet Explorer with Windows.
• C. Microsoft Corp. v. United States
  Microsoft Corp. v. United States is a landmark legal case in which the U.S. government’s authority to compel a technology company to produce customer data stored on foreign servers under U.S. law was contested.
• D. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.
  Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. is a landmark 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the patentability of medical diagnostic methods by holding that laws of nature and their routine applications are not eligible for patent protection.
• E. Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
  Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the CFPB’s leadership structure unconstitutional because its single director was insulated from presidential removal, reshaping limits on independent agencies.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International
Triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International]

Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International is a landmark 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly restricted the patentability of software and abstract business methods under patent law.

Target entity: Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International
Target entity description: Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International is a landmark 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly restricted the patentability of software and abstract business methods under patent law.

• A. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion
  AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that the Federal Arbitration Act preempts state laws that deem class-action waivers in arbitration agreements unconscionable, thereby strengthening the enforceability of mandatory individual arbitration clauses.
• B. United States v. Microsoft Corp.
  United States v. Microsoft Corp. was a major U.S. antitrust lawsuit in the late 1990s and early 2000s that challenged Microsoft's dominance in the personal computer operating systems market, particularly its practices related to bundling Internet Explorer with Windows.
• C. Microsoft Corp. v. United States
  Microsoft Corp. v. United States is a landmark legal case in which the U.S. government’s authority to compel a technology company to produce customer data stored on foreign servers under U.S. law was contested.
• D. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.
  Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. is a landmark 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the patentability of medical diagnostic methods by holding that laws of nature and their routine applications are not eligible for patent protection.
• E. Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
  Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the CFPB’s leadership structure unconstitutional because its single director was insulated from presidential removal, reshaping limits on independent agencies.
• F. None of above. chosen