Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International
E1201257
UNEXPLORED
Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International is a landmark 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly restricted the patentability of software and abstract business methods under patent law.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T16205781 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International Context triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International]
-
A.
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that the Federal Arbitration Act preempts state laws that deem class-action waivers in arbitration agreements unconscionable, thereby strengthening the enforceability of mandatory individual arbitration clauses.
-
B.
United States v. Microsoft Corp.
United States v. Microsoft Corp. was a major U.S. antitrust lawsuit in the late 1990s and early 2000s that challenged Microsoft's dominance in the personal computer operating systems market, particularly its practices related to bundling Internet Explorer with Windows.
-
C.
Microsoft Corp. v. United States
Microsoft Corp. v. United States is a landmark legal case in which the U.S. government’s authority to compel a technology company to produce customer data stored on foreign servers under U.S. law was contested.
-
D.
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. is a landmark 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the patentability of medical diagnostic methods by holding that laws of nature and their routine applications are not eligible for patent protection.
-
E.
Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the CFPB’s leadership structure unconstitutional because its single director was insulated from presidential removal, reshaping limits on independent agencies.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International Target entity description: Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International is a landmark 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly restricted the patentability of software and abstract business methods under patent law.
-
A.
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that the Federal Arbitration Act preempts state laws that deem class-action waivers in arbitration agreements unconscionable, thereby strengthening the enforceability of mandatory individual arbitration clauses.
-
B.
United States v. Microsoft Corp.
United States v. Microsoft Corp. was a major U.S. antitrust lawsuit in the late 1990s and early 2000s that challenged Microsoft's dominance in the personal computer operating systems market, particularly its practices related to bundling Internet Explorer with Windows.
-
C.
Microsoft Corp. v. United States
Microsoft Corp. v. United States is a landmark legal case in which the U.S. government’s authority to compel a technology company to produce customer data stored on foreign servers under U.S. law was contested.
-
D.
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. is a landmark 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the patentability of medical diagnostic methods by holding that laws of nature and their routine applications are not eligible for patent protection.
-
E.
Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the CFPB’s leadership structure unconstitutional because its single director was insulated from presidential removal, reshaping limits on independent agencies.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.