Triple
T16205779
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | October Term 2013 |
E393323
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPart |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc.
Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held appellate courts must apply an abuse-of-discretion standard when reviewing district court decisions on attorney’s fees in patent litigation.
|
E1201255
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc. | Statement: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc.]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc. Context triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc.]
-
A.
Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. Allstate Insurance Co.
Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. Allstate Insurance Co. is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the conflict between federal procedural rules and state laws limiting class actions in federal diversity jurisdiction.
-
B.
Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health and Human Services
Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health and Human Services is a landmark federal court case in which the District of Massachusetts struck down key provisions of the Defense of Marriage Act as unconstitutional for denying federal recognition and benefits to same-sex marriages recognized by the state.
-
C.
St. Mary’s Honor Center v. Hicks
St. Mary’s Honor Center v. Hicks is a 1993 U.S. Supreme Court decision that tightened the burden on plaintiffs in employment discrimination cases by holding that proving an employer’s stated reason is pretextual does not automatically establish intentional discrimination.
-
D.
Meredith v. Fair
Meredith v. Fair was a landmark federal court case that paved the way for James Meredith’s historic 1962 enrollment as the first Black student at the University of Mississippi, challenging entrenched racial segregation in higher education.
-
E.
Adkins v. Children’s Hospital
Adkins v. Children’s Hospital is a 1923 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a minimum wage law for women in the District of Columbia, marking a key moment in the Lochner-era protection of freedom of contract.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc. Triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc.]
Generated description
Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held appellate courts must apply an abuse-of-discretion standard when reviewing district court decisions on attorney’s fees in patent litigation.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc. Target entity description: Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held appellate courts must apply an abuse-of-discretion standard when reviewing district court decisions on attorney’s fees in patent litigation.
-
A.
Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. Allstate Insurance Co.
Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. Allstate Insurance Co. is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the conflict between federal procedural rules and state laws limiting class actions in federal diversity jurisdiction.
-
B.
Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health and Human Services
Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health and Human Services is a landmark federal court case in which the District of Massachusetts struck down key provisions of the Defense of Marriage Act as unconstitutional for denying federal recognition and benefits to same-sex marriages recognized by the state.
-
C.
St. Mary’s Honor Center v. Hicks
St. Mary’s Honor Center v. Hicks is a 1993 U.S. Supreme Court decision that tightened the burden on plaintiffs in employment discrimination cases by holding that proving an employer’s stated reason is pretextual does not automatically establish intentional discrimination.
-
D.
Meredith v. Fair
Meredith v. Fair was a landmark federal court case that paved the way for James Meredith’s historic 1962 enrollment as the first Black student at the University of Mississippi, challenging entrenched racial segregation in higher education.
-
E.
Adkins v. Children’s Hospital
Adkins v. Children’s Hospital is a 1923 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a minimum wage law for women in the District of Columbia, marking a key moment in the Lochner-era protection of freedom of contract.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f1f5bd08190bd01cac0d5b9d2ef |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e2270f047c819084645da27759a3d2 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:26 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a00078fa2ac8190a0a2cf38bc41498d |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:20 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_6a000900bfbc8190b21eb513838759a9 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:26 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_6a000a0fc93c819088d9233aaa5e2017 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:31 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:03 a.m.