Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp. | Statement: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp.]

Target entity: Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp.
Context triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp.]

• A. Hudson v. McMillian
  Hudson v. McMillian is a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court case that held that the use of excessive physical force against a prisoner can violate the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment even when the inmate does not suffer serious injury.
• B. Alabama v. Shelton
  Alabama v. Shelton is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a suspended sentence that may result in imprisonment cannot be imposed unless the defendant was afforded the right to counsel.
• C. Hurd v. Hodge
  Hurd v. Hodge is a 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racially restrictive covenants in property deeds could not be judicially enforced in the District of Columbia because such enforcement would violate the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
• D. Williamson v. Lee Optical Co.
  Williamson v. Lee Optical Co. is a 1955 U.S. Supreme Court case that became a leading precedent for the highly deferential rational basis review of economic regulation under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses.
• E. Mississippi Department of Health in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
  The Mississippi Department of Health in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization was the state agency defending Mississippi’s restrictive abortion law in the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that ultimately overturned Roe v. Wade.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp.
Triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp.]

Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a parens patriae action brought by a state is not a “mass action” removable to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act.

Target entity: Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp.
Target entity description: Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a parens patriae action brought by a state is not a “mass action” removable to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act.

• A. Hudson v. McMillian
  Hudson v. McMillian is a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court case that held that the use of excessive physical force against a prisoner can violate the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment even when the inmate does not suffer serious injury.
• B. Alabama v. Shelton
  Alabama v. Shelton is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a suspended sentence that may result in imprisonment cannot be imposed unless the defendant was afforded the right to counsel.
• C. Hurd v. Hodge
  Hurd v. Hodge is a 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racially restrictive covenants in property deeds could not be judicially enforced in the District of Columbia because such enforcement would violate the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
• D. Williamson v. Lee Optical Co.
  Williamson v. Lee Optical Co. is a 1955 U.S. Supreme Court case that became a leading precedent for the highly deferential rational basis review of economic regulation under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses.
• E. Mississippi Department of Health in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
  The Mississippi Department of Health in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization was the state agency defending Mississippi’s restrictive abortion law in the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that ultimately overturned Roe v. Wade.
• F. None of above. chosen