Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp.
E1201244
UNEXPLORED
Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a parens patriae action brought by a state is not a “mass action” removable to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp. canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T16205765 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp. Context triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp.]
-
A.
Hudson v. McMillian
Hudson v. McMillian is a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court case that held that the use of excessive physical force against a prisoner can violate the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment even when the inmate does not suffer serious injury.
-
B.
Alabama v. Shelton
Alabama v. Shelton is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a suspended sentence that may result in imprisonment cannot be imposed unless the defendant was afforded the right to counsel.
-
C.
Hurd v. Hodge
Hurd v. Hodge is a 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racially restrictive covenants in property deeds could not be judicially enforced in the District of Columbia because such enforcement would violate the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
D.
Williamson v. Lee Optical Co.
Williamson v. Lee Optical Co. is a 1955 U.S. Supreme Court case that became a leading precedent for the highly deferential rational basis review of economic regulation under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses.
-
E.
Mississippi Department of Health in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
The Mississippi Department of Health in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization was the state agency defending Mississippi’s restrictive abortion law in the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that ultimately overturned Roe v. Wade.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp. Target entity description: Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a parens patriae action brought by a state is not a “mass action” removable to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act.
-
A.
Hudson v. McMillian
Hudson v. McMillian is a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court case that held that the use of excessive physical force against a prisoner can violate the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment even when the inmate does not suffer serious injury.
-
B.
Alabama v. Shelton
Alabama v. Shelton is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a suspended sentence that may result in imprisonment cannot be imposed unless the defendant was afforded the right to counsel.
-
C.
Hurd v. Hodge
Hurd v. Hodge is a 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racially restrictive covenants in property deeds could not be judicially enforced in the District of Columbia because such enforcement would violate the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
D.
Williamson v. Lee Optical Co.
Williamson v. Lee Optical Co. is a 1955 U.S. Supreme Court case that became a leading precedent for the highly deferential rational basis review of economic regulation under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses.
-
E.
Mississippi Department of Health in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
The Mississippi Department of Health in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization was the state agency defending Mississippi’s restrictive abortion law in the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that ultimately overturned Roe v. Wade.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.