Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Kaley v. United States | Statement: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Kaley v. United States]

Target entity: Kaley v. United States
Context triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Kaley v. United States]

• A. United States v. Mosley
  United States v. Mosley is a landmark 1915 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed federal authority to prosecute officials who corrupt or falsify vote counts in federal elections.
• B. Yates v. United States
  Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
• C. United States v. Basye
  United States v. Basye is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the tax treatment of income assigned to others, particularly in the context of professional partnerships and deferred compensation arrangements.
• D. Kastigar v. United States
  Kastigar v. United States is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the government may compel testimony from a witness who invokes the Fifth Amendment by granting use and derivative-use immunity, which is coextensive with the privilege against self-incrimination.
• E. Ray v. Blair
  Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: Kaley v. United States
Triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Kaley v. United States]

Kaley v. United States is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held criminal defendants are not entitled to a pretrial hearing to challenge the grand jury’s probable cause determination underlying the government’s seizure of their assets.

Target entity: Kaley v. United States
Target entity description: Kaley v. United States is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held criminal defendants are not entitled to a pretrial hearing to challenge the grand jury’s probable cause determination underlying the government’s seizure of their assets.

• A. United States v. Mosley
  United States v. Mosley is a landmark 1915 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed federal authority to prosecute officials who corrupt or falsify vote counts in federal elections.
• B. Yates v. United States
  Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
• C. United States v. Basye
  United States v. Basye is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the tax treatment of income assigned to others, particularly in the context of professional partnerships and deferred compensation arrangements.
• D. Kastigar v. United States
  Kastigar v. United States is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the government may compel testimony from a witness who invokes the Fifth Amendment by granting use and derivative-use immunity, which is coextensive with the privilege against self-incrimination.
• E. Ray v. Blair
  Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
• F. None of above. chosen