Kaley v. United States
E1201235
UNEXPLORED
Kaley v. United States is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held criminal defendants are not entitled to a pretrial hearing to challenge the grand jury’s probable cause determination underlying the government’s seizure of their assets.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Kaley v. United States canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T16205754 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kaley v. United States Context triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Kaley v. United States]
-
A.
United States v. Mosley
United States v. Mosley is a landmark 1915 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed federal authority to prosecute officials who corrupt or falsify vote counts in federal elections.
-
B.
Yates v. United States
Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
-
C.
United States v. Basye
United States v. Basye is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the tax treatment of income assigned to others, particularly in the context of professional partnerships and deferred compensation arrangements.
-
D.
Kastigar v. United States
Kastigar v. United States is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the government may compel testimony from a witness who invokes the Fifth Amendment by granting use and derivative-use immunity, which is coextensive with the privilege against self-incrimination.
-
E.
Ray v. Blair
Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kaley v. United States Target entity description: Kaley v. United States is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held criminal defendants are not entitled to a pretrial hearing to challenge the grand jury’s probable cause determination underlying the government’s seizure of their assets.
-
A.
United States v. Mosley
United States v. Mosley is a landmark 1915 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed federal authority to prosecute officials who corrupt or falsify vote counts in federal elections.
-
B.
Yates v. United States
Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
-
C.
United States v. Basye
United States v. Basye is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the tax treatment of income assigned to others, particularly in the context of professional partnerships and deferred compensation arrangements.
-
D.
Kastigar v. United States
Kastigar v. United States is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the government may compel testimony from a witness who invokes the Fifth Amendment by granting use and derivative-use immunity, which is coextensive with the privilege against self-incrimination.
-
E.
Ray v. Blair
Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.