Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. | Statement: [Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney, relatedCase, Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.]

Target entity: Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.
Context triple: [Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney, relatedCase, Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.]

• A. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. chosen
  Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. is a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the standard for proving discriminatory intent in equal protection challenges to facially neutral government actions, particularly in the context of zoning and housing discrimination.
• B. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.
  Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. is a landmark 1968 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that Congress may prohibit all racial discrimination, private as well as public, in the sale or rental of property under 42 U.S.C. § 1982.
• C. McDonald v. City of Chicago
  McDonald v. City of Chicago is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms applies to state and local governments through the Fourteenth Amendment.
• D. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe
  Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe is a landmark 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly limited federal agencies’ discretion in approving highway construction through public parks and strengthened judicial review of administrative decisions.
• E. Emporium Capwell Co. v. Western Addition Community Organization
  Emporium Capwell Co. v. Western Addition Community Organization is a 1975 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the ability of minority employees to bypass union grievance procedures by bringing discrimination complaints directly to employers under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.