Triple
T16115318
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. |
E390987
|
entity |
| Predicate | holding |
P2237
|
FINISHED |
| Object | the National Voter Registration Act preempts Arizona’s additional documentary proof-of-citizenship requirement for the federal form |
E31508
|
NE FINISHED |
Disambiguation candidates (1 decision)
The exact options the model was shown at each disambiguation step, with the option it chose highlighted — the evidence behind this triple's disambiguated ids.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: the National Voter Registration Act preempts Arizona’s additional documentary proof-of-citizenship requirement for the federal form Context triple: [Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc., holding, the National Voter Registration Act preempts Arizona’s additional documentary proof-of-citizenship requirement for the federal form]
-
A.
National Voter Registration Act
chosen
The National Voter Registration Act is a U.S. federal law designed to increase voter participation by simplifying and standardizing the process of registering to vote, including through motor vehicle agencies and mail-in registration.
-
B.
Voting Rights Act requirements
Voting Rights Act requirements are federal legal standards designed to prevent racial discrimination in voting and ensure fair and equal access to the electoral process.
-
C.
Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act
The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act is a U.S. federal law that guarantees the right of military personnel and citizens living abroad to register and vote absentee in federal elections.
-
D.
Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee
Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the scope of federal protections against voting discrimination, particularly under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
-
E.
Arizona v. Johnson
Arizona v. Johnson is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified police authority to frisk passengers during lawful traffic stops when officers reasonably suspect they are armed and dangerous.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
| Stage | Batch ID | Job type | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| creating | batch_69d87f1a8dd881909f1de6ef78849874 |
elicitation | completed |
| NER | batch_69e2016a9dd48190bca3f58778ed865f |
ner | completed |
| NED1 | batch_69ffebab779c8190b466c26f4024aa31 |
ned_source_triple | completed |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5 a.m.