Triple
T15704304
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jam |
E380667
|
entity |
| Predicate | isPreservedBy |
P120371
|
FINISHED |
| Object | high sugar content |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: high sugar content | Statement: [Jam, isPreservedBy, high sugar content]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isPreservedBy Context triple: [Jam, isPreservedBy, high sugar content]
-
A.
somePreservedAs
Indicates that at least one part or instance of an entity is kept or maintained in a particular state, form, or condition.
-
B.
isKeptBy
Indicates that something is maintained, possessed, or held in the care or custody of a particular entity.
-
C.
isPreservationPriority
Indicates that an entity has been designated as a high-priority target for protection, conservation, or maintenance over time.
-
D.
isKeptFor
Indicates that one entity is retained or preserved for the benefit, use, or purpose of another entity.
-
E.
partiallyPreservedThrough
Indicates that something is not fully intact but has been maintained or conserved to some extent by or via another entity or medium.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86d9bf930819082b30cf6d169297c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e0b4d6b5788190883746ee82c799f5 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e0051d639481909a10614e8f83e659 |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:37 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e0b4d01c9c81909f6b611e8144c838 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:45 a.m.