Triple
T1567800
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Public Law 103-141 |
E33470
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedCase |
P3137
|
FINISHED |
| Object | City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997) |
E39104
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997) | Statement: [Public Law 103-141, relatedCase, City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997) Context triple: [Public Law 103-141, relatedCase, City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997)]
-
A.
City of Boerne v. Flores
chosen
City of Boerne v. Flores is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that curtailed Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment and held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act could not be applied to the states.
-
B.
Van Orden v. Perry
Van Orden v. Perry is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of a Ten Commandments monument on Texas State Capitol grounds against an Establishment Clause challenge.
-
C.
Eisenstadt v. Baird
Eisenstadt v. Baird is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the right to possess and use contraceptives to unmarried individuals, significantly advancing privacy and equal protection jurisprudence.
-
D.
South Dakota v. Dole
South Dakota v. Dole is a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power to condition federal highway funds on states adopting a minimum drinking age of 21, helping define the scope of the federal spending power.
-
E.
DeBoer v. Snyder
DeBoer v. Snyder was a federal court case challenging Michigan’s same-sex marriage ban that became one of the key cases consolidated into the landmark Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a885f11b048190935025a035302715 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a908a0314c8190a5ce3e32dd9035db |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:37 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ad371b99fc8190b8af03444fd1252b |
completed | March 8, 2026, 8:45 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:27 p.m.